Discourse Position. The category of a discourse position
can refer to a specific ideological position of a person, plane
or medium. In particular
- The discourse position is the (ideological) location from which
people participate in the discourse and assess it. This applies
to individuals and also groups or institutions, which may also
take part in discourses.
- Any discourse position is typified by particular discursive
entanglements which feed on the previously, current and expected
experiences of the participant. This is often entirely predictable.
- The discourse position is a result of the person's previous
involvement in various discourses in which the individual has
been subjected (involved). The person has been "knitted into"
the discourse, and has "knitted in" the discourse into
their own position
- What begins as a discourse position may develop further (and
be fixed) into an ideological or institutional position.
- Correspondingly, this applies to the media and to entire discourse
strands, which form certain (implicit) discourse positions, which
shape overall reporting
Groups and individuals can assess and use discourse positions in
- Hegemonial discourses might see a supermarket as a positive
symbol of wealth.
- Anti-hegemonial discourses might see the supermarket negatively
(idealising small shops and small farmers)
- Economic discourses might only look at the balance sheet.
- There may even be people so influenced by the discourses to
think of "my favourite supermarket"
- These deviating positions relate to the same basic discourse
structure, the supermarket
- These discourse positions belong (in a rough form) to the general
knowledge of the population - they usually distrust both of the
Discourse positions within a dominant or hegemonial discourse are
usually rather homogeneous. This can be seen as a function of hegemony
- the positions will agree :-
- Not to rock the boat
- Not to cast doubt on the ruling economic system
- Discourse positions which DO deviate from the dominant are sometimes
assigned to the camp of 'all opposing discourses', whether they
fit there or not
- However, opposing discourses (and elements of them) can be introduced
subversively into the hegemonial discourse (e.g. the cliché
'time is money' can be turned into a criticism of capitalism)
- Some opposing discourses are allowed to exist, for example,
the organic discourse has been allowed to enter supermarkets,
but in a tightly controlled way in terms of packaging and shelf-life
- it has to fit in with the 'supermarket paradigm' to get in